Director Penelope Spheeris’ new comedy “Balls to the Wall,” was hardly Premiere in Europe, where piracy has begun to appear on the Internet, launching its American release in danger. Spheeris An assistant sent no less than 30 cease- the notice-and not a day in a desperate, but do not try to stop piracy.
“It’s like a forest fire with bare feet,” she said.
This helps explain why Spheeris and other support filmmakers tough new legislation making its way to Congress that the Department of Justice would be broad powers to shut down sites that host pirated material and would be the way for movie studios, record labels and other rights holders to seek injunctions against the Internet companies opened in the theft of intellectual property, which is allocating $ 58000000000 believe a year.
Internet entrepreneur Gabriel Weinberg as vehemently against the bill, he is anxious to punish the legitimate search engines that link and unwittingly pirated stifle innovation on the Web. As I raised just $ 3 million for his young search engine DuckDuckGo: “I do not spend anything on legal fees and court costs,” said Weinberg, president of the company.
Spheeris and Weinberg represented opposing sides in a battle in Congress that divided the two industries most glamorous and energy in California: Hollywood and Silicon Valley. On the one hand, the old media entertainment companies like Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox, alleging that the search companies, such as fencing are hidden on private property by collecting advertising revenue on sites where the pirates. On the other hand, the new media giants such as Google, Yahoo, eBay and Facebook, say the proposed legislation threatens freedom of expression and stability of the World Wide Web technology to endanger
“It’s an epic battle between two enormous interest, both are very, very important to our economy,” said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Menlo Park), who represents Silicon Valley.
Pass the bills pending in the House and Senate, the Department of Justice the power of court orders U.S. to search engines and websites, access to foreign Web sites hawking pirated copies trying to block content . Private companies such as Paramount Pictures and Sony Music Entertainment may also be able to avoid court orders that these sites are looking to receive announcements and payment services in the United States
The fight is curiously non-party, with conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats and the two sides of the issue. Some of the division is based on the most dominant industry in the region is a member. Many Southern California representative position back in Hollywood, and most of Northern California by side with the Internet company. But political philosophy also plays a role, what anti-big-government conservative and liberal civil rights activists in opposition to give Washington what they fear would reach full power of censorship on the sites.
In the melee, the Motion Picture Association. of America. Hollywood’s lobbying arm-in-chief, recruited the support of a broad coalition of business and labor, including the AFL-CIO and the Recording Industry Association. of America. Since the bills to protect against counterfeiting and obtaining patents for prescription drugs, they also have the support of the Chamber of Commerce of U. S. and the pharmaceutical trade group PhRMA influence.
“Some in the tech community believe that even if the site is used at home to steal copyrighted material that is not their problem,”MPAA CEO Christopher J. Dodd, former senator from Connecticut, said recently in a speech. “It is time to take a firm stand against pirate sites, and parasites who profit from the outright theft of our content. ”
Opponents of the bill ‘also to support and millions of their messages. A coalition of Internet companies to take up full-page ads published in major newspapers this month on concerns about the dangers of the bill and urge the legislature a more targeted approach.
“This bill is really thermonuclear war on the Internet,” said Markham Erickson, director of NetCoalition, a trade group, the Internet and high-tech companies like Google, Yahoo, Amazon and Ebay is.
Such rhetoric infuriates top studio executives.
“It’s my understanding that the Internet was created to withstand a nuclear attack,” said Fox Filmed Entertainment Co-Chairman and CEO Jim Gianopulos. “I am curious to understand how a lawyer in the Justice Department implemented a procedure in federal court can take it.”
“The idea that this will kill the Internet is like a panic,” said Barry Meyer, Chairman and CEO of Warner Bros. Entertainment.
The MPAA estimates the nation’s more than 300,000 jobs, $ 16 billion in revenue and lost $ 58 billion in total economic output each year because of pirated movies, music, software and video games.
“It’s the number one problem for us,” said Scott Harbinson, international representative of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, which has 113,000 members in the United States and Canada. “If people are not investing in film production, because of piracy do not work our guys.”
But critics in the technology industry will see the legislation as a dangerous curve ahead.
Google advises Katherine Oyama author warned that the bill in the House “would be the legal architecture, economic and cultural, that led to the extraordinary growth of Internet commerce to undermine,” and said it would impose “sanctions severe and arbitrary without a fair trial. ”
Both parties bring money for the fight. Although the specific bill numbers are not available, the pharmaceutical industry $ 182 million on lobbying in Washington was dedicated in 2011, more than any other industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics nonpartisan. The television industry, film and music and spent $ 91.8 million, with the computer industry and the Internet just behind at 91.5 million. Google will only have to spend $ 5.9 million.
No one disputes the parties is that online piracy is a problem. And because of the pending bills have bipartisan support, they have a good chance of passing next year, but probably with revisions that would reduce its scope.
The President of the Senate Judiciary Committee Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), one of the key legislators behind the law, said he is prepared to revise his bill reflects the concerns of technology companies, but it is cardboard against the unauthorized sites.
“There are so many and so it was useful on the Internet. I want to protect that,” said Leahy. “But I do not want to protect thieves.”